On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 07:03 +1000, Kel Modderman wrote: > Yep. I think either /usr/bin or /bin is most appropriate, but I just have this > feeling that someone will want their wifi to get /usr/ mounted sometime (this > is Debian, they want to do this crazy stuff all the time), which means that > using /bin now would cause less headaches in the future (when everyones scripts > are using absolute paths to /usr/bin/iw already...). It's pathogenic, and I'd suggest to put iw into the initramfs ;) > If that is a realistic scenario, it would leave the choice of the Debian iw > maintainer to a) say that use case is not possible, and stick to his guns, or > b) move iw to /bin and thus possibly diverge from what the rest of the > distro's, and you as upstream, are doing. Doesn't that depend on libnl upstream again? That installs to /usr/lib by default, so I don't think I should install to /bin as iw upstream. I'd be willing to change but it seems that it depends on libnl upstream changing too? johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part