On 08/03/05 16:24 +0530, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag said ... > I was hoping that an early release of clang would be made with llvm 2.2 > which can be packaged, that did not happen [1]. I will look at how I > can make a clean standalone clang package [2] that can be built > independent of the llvm svn source tree, but depending only on the llvm > packages in unstable. > > [1] http://llvm.org/releases/2.2/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#whatsnew > [2] http://llvm.org/docs/Projects.html clang continues to be under development and upstream advises that it be compiled alongside the 'current svn version of llvm', so I will wait for an official release before packaging. Cheers, Giridhar -- Y Giridhar Appaji Nag | http://appaji.net/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature