[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#495630: libfaketime or just faketime?



The libfaketime LD_PRELOAD hack would be really useful to me for
writing a test suite for some time-sensitive code.  However, packaging
it as a library seems a little bit weird.  I'm tempted to package it
instead as a simple binary package called "faketime", by analogy with
fakeroot and fakechroot.

I'd write (and provide upstream, if they want it) a simple
/usr/bin/faketime wrapper script and man page if i went this route.

Any thoughts on the right thing to do?  It seems a little silly to
worry about the nuances of library packaging when this is clearly not
used as a typical library would be used.  (e.g. calling ldconfig in
post{inst,rm} makes no sense).

OTOH, upstream does explicitly call the package libfaketime.

I welcome suggestions.

  --dkg

Attachment: pgpS6hg54NJPU.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: