On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 11:58:46AM +0200, Guus Sliepen wrote: > On Mon, Jul 28, 2008, Sylvain Le Gall wrote: > > > uuidm is the name of the source package. libuuidm-ocaml-dev is the > > name of the binary package as per OCaml Policy. > > Perhaps it is better to also include "ocaml" in the source package name. > There are a lot of languages, and they probably all have > module/library/component for generating hashes and unique identifiers. > To avoid possible conflicts in the source package name space, make your > source package identifier unique as well ;) > I tend to agree with your suggestion but I also stick to upstream name (which is uuidm) that I don't control. Diverting from upstream is not good, so I think I will stay with uuidm (the "m" is saving me ;-) I don't think upstream will switch to ocaml-uuid (which is the package name I will have chosen if I have done it). Regards Sylvain Le Gall
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature