Bug#491316: marked as done (RFA: netpipes -- a package to manipulate BSD TCP/IP stream sockets)
Your message dated Sun, 20 Jul 2008 01:00:42 +0200
with message-id <20080719230042.GQ11882@mail-vs.djpig.de>
and subject line I don't know what you want to do
has caused the Debian Bug report #491311,
regarding RFA: netpipes -- a package to manipulate BSD TCP/IP stream sockets
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
491311: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=491311
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I request an adopter for the netpipes package.
The package description is:
The netpipes package makes TCP/IP streams usable in shell
scripts. It can also simplify client/server code by
allowing the programmer to skip all the tedious program-
ming bits related to sockets and concentrate on writing a
filter/service.
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.25-2-vserver-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkiAo6UACgkQMu62kjzByT9t9ACfU42u7rADTbxKJa/trX4gLh7Y
08gAniQQnwwiLhJarr5DP0NJbxTyvRE/
=f4u+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
__________________________________________________
Faça ligações para outros computadores com o novo Yahoo! Messenger
http://br.beta.messenger.yahoo.com/
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
You filed RFAs for two packages you don't actually maintain. If you
wanted to make ITAs for them, please retitle the existing WNPP bugs
for them instead.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--- End Message ---
Reply to: