[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#491315: marked as done (RFA: netsed -- The network packet altering stream editor)

Your message dated Sun, 20 Jul 2008 01:00:42 +0200
with message-id <20080719230042.GQ11882@mail-vs.djpig.de>
and subject line I don't know what you want to do
has caused the Debian Bug report #491312,
regarding RFA: netsed -- The network packet altering stream editor
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
491312: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=491312
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


I request an adopter for the netsed package.

The package description is:
 NetSED is small and handful utility designed to alter the contents of
 packets forwarded thru your network in real time. It is really useful
 for network hackers in following applications:
 .
   * black-box protocol auditing - whenever there are two or more
     proprietary boxes communicating over undocumented protocol (by
     enforcing  changes in ongoing transmissions, you will be able to
     test if tested application is secure),
 .
   * fuzz-alike experiments, integrity tests - whenever you want to test
     stability of the application and see how it ensures data integrity,
 .
   * other common applications - fooling other people, content filtering,
     etc etc - choose whatever you want to.
 .
 It perfectly fits ngrep, netcat and tcpdump tools suite.

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.25-2-vserver-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkiAo2sACgkQMu62kjzByT+iRwCeIIBlcF0wWLKn0PNbJtZbuIdb
rEoAnjTYY6Zi8aU3NVUEEsh1KQt/+HOg
=KP5e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

	

	
		
_______________________________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail - Sempre a melhor opção para você! 
Experimente já e veja as novidades. 
http://br.yahoo.com/mailbeta/tudonovo/

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
You filed RFAs for two packages you don't actually maintain. If you
wanted to make ITAs for them, please retitle the existing WNPP bugs
for them instead.

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
www: http://www.djpig.de/

--- End Message ---
Reply to: