Bug#487134: O: wmmon -- Window Maker dockapp for monitoring system information
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
The current maintainer of wmmon, Simon Law <sfllaw@debian.org>,
is apparently not active anymore. Therefore, I orphan this package
now. If you want to be the new maintainer, please take it -- see
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/index.html#howto-o for detailed
instructions how to adopt a package properly.
Some information about this package:
Package: wmmon
Binary: wmmon
Version: 1.0b2-14
Priority: optional
Section: x11
Maintainer: Simon Law <sfllaw@debian.org>
Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.0.0), libx11-dev, libxpm-dev, libxext-dev
Architecture: any
Standards-Version: 3.6.1
Format: 1.0
Directory: pool/main/w/wmmon
Files: 60d0b979a90f396f3ae7bd7166bc97e8 587 wmmon_1.0b2-14.dsc
d1d6ccc68428c460ad85d1af85ef7414 21422 wmmon_1.0b2.orig.tar.gz
917960c0477cc9c86bc6594b462632d9 8690 wmmon_1.0b2-14.diff.gz
Package: wmmon
Priority: optional
Section: x11
Installed-Size: 112
Maintainer: Simon Law <sfllaw@debian.org>
Architecture: i386
Version: 1.0b2-14
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-4), libx11-6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libxext6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libxpm4 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0)
Filename: pool/main/w/wmmon/wmmon_1.0b2-14_i386.deb
Size: 17234
MD5sum: 51b3817ce0d5ccb2156eb06dd7eab416
SHA1: 6fd1ebf9015ebcc78f45c976b28609373741ee91
SHA256: 5415b0e477a94d20a6dc69243f6e531fce0926dc6b320cae8676b69f645c15d6
Description: Window Maker dockapp for monitoring system information
WMMon monitors the realtime CPU load as well as the average system load,
and gives you some nice additional features too. It is intended for
docking in Window Maker.
.
It currently provides:
.
* a realtime CPU stress meter;
* an auto-scaled average system load meter, like xload and wmavgload;
* a realtime disk I/O stress meter;
* auto-scaled disk I/O load meter;
* realtime memory and swap usage meters;
* a display for system uptime;
* three user-defined commands to launch.
Tag: interface::x11, role::program, scope::utility, suite::gnustep, use::monitor, x11::applet
Reply to: