[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#480440: marked as done (ITP: libfastthread-ruby -- extension which re-implements the primitives in)



Your message dated Mon, 12 May 2008 13:41:45 -0700
with message-id <20080512204145.GM3079@centurion.befour.org>
and subject line closed
has caused the Debian Bug report #480440,
regarding ITP: libfastthread-ruby -- extension which re-implements the primitives in
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
480440: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=480440
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sebastien Delafond <seb@debian.org>


* Package name    : libfastthread-ruby
  Version         : 1.0.1
  Upstream Author : mental@rydia.net
* URL             : http://rubyforge.org/projects/mongrel/
* License         : Ruby License
  Programming Lang: Ruby
  Description     : extension which re-implements the primitives in Ruby's thread.rb in C

fastthread is a Ruby extension which re-implements the primitives in
Ruby's thread.rb in C.  It was merged into 1.8.6, replacing the old
thread.rb implementation, but the version that was merged had a couple
serious bugs.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.24-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.ISO-8859-15, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO-8859-15 (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
removed from NEW by ftp-master.

--Seb


--- End Message ---

Reply to: