Bug#247337: [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: lives_0.9.8.10-1_powerpc.changes REJECTED]]
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Fwd: lives_0.9.8.10-1_powerpc.changes REJECTED]
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:48:55 +0200 (CEST)
From: salsaman@xs4all.nl
To: Gürkan Sengün <gurkan@phys.ethz.ch>
On Tue, April 29, 2008 09:29, Gürkan Sengün wrote:
Dear Salsaman,
Could you relicense all of your software parts of lives into
GNU GPL v3, or 2, or 2.1, whatever you like best?
That'll make inclusion of lives into Debian (and Ubuntu) a lot
easier.
Thank you,
Gürkan
Hi,
all of the LiVES software is licensed under the GPL v3 or later. The only
exception is weed.h, weed.c, weed-utils.c which will become a library
under the LGPL v3 or later. If you find any source files which are
incorrectly licensed, please let me know and I will correct this.
RFX.spec is a documentation file which documents a standard. I am happy to
change the license for this to whatever you recommend (what does debian
recommend for standards ?).
I will take a look at the debian/copyright file and update it as necessary.
Regards,
Gabriel.
http://lives.sf.net
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: lives_0.9.8.10-1_powerpc.changes REJECTED
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:29:20 +0000
From: Joerg Jaspert <ftpmaster@debian.org>
To: Gürkan Sengün <gurkan@phys.ethz.ch>
CC: Debian Installer <installer@ftp-master.debian.org>
Hi Maintainer,
rejected, includes non-free components. Like RFX.spec.
Additionally your debian/copyright file is incomplete and misses
(C)holders/license data. You have to include all such differences.
Like all of libOSC/*, some of the icons.
And next, it includes a mixture of GPL/LGPL v2/v2.1 and v3.
Now you need to check if all v2/v2.1 ones are "or any later". If not it
is undistributable.
--
bye Joerg
===
If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the
override file requires editing, reply to this email.
Reply to: