Hi, @Guus: thanks for your hints. I can easily change that. @Nico: there is not much difference betweeen monkey and other webservers. There are already lots of other webservers in the repositories like mini_httpd, micro_httpd, dhttpd. Do they differ that much? Debian is always full of pride regarding the large amount of software-packages. So why not add this one? Please don't get me wrong - I got your point. I just want do understand your concerns. Regards, Thorsten Schmale On 27/02/08 21:29 +0100, Nico Golde wrote: > Hi Thorsten, > * Thorsten Schmale <thorsten@schmalenegger.com> [2008-02-27 16:19]: > > Package: wnpp > > Severity: wishlist > > Owner: Thorsten Schmale <thorsten@schmalenegger.com> > > > > * Package name : monkey > > Version : 0.9.2 > > Upstream Author : Eduardo Silva <edsiper@gmail.com> > > * URL : http://monkeyd.sourceforge.net/ > > * License : GPL > > Programming Lang: C > > Description : monkey is a small webserver based on the HTTP/1.1 protocol > > > > Monkey is a Web Server written in C based on the HTTP/1.1 protocol. The > > objective is to develop a fast, efficient, small and easy to configure > > webserver. > > Although it is very small and does not need much system resources, it > > has a lot of nice features like Multithreading, Mimetype Support, > > Virtualhosts, CGI & PHP, Basic Security features (Deny by URL + IP) > > How does it differ from lighttpd, thttpd or fnord? Why do we > need yet another webserver in the archive? > Kind regards > Nico > -- > Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de - nion@jabber.ccc.de - GPG: 0x73647CFF > For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted. -- THERE ARE PLENTY OF BUSINESSES LIKE SHOW BUSINESS THERE ARE PLENTY OF BUSINESSES LIKE SHOW BUSINESS THERE ARE PLENTY OF BUSINESSES LIKE SHOW BUSINESS THERE ARE PLENTY OF BUSINESSES LIKE SHOW BUSINESS Bart Simpson on chalkboard in episode 1F19
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature