[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#467274: Two ITPs for pcc



Hi,

Yes. That is fine. But I would prefer Mercurial to git if possible.

William

On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 16:51 +0100, Arthur Loiret wrote:
> Sure, William, are you interested in co-mainting pcc in a git somewhere?
> 
> Thanks for the sponsoring offer Nelson, but my AM (Pierre Habouzit)
> should be ok to upload it. ;-)
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Arthur.
> 
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 05:40:43PM -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> > Hi people!
> > 
> > There are two ITPs for the same packages (bugs #442913 and #467274).
> > I am not merging them since I want to know the status of the package
> > (Arthur has it ITPed since Sep 17, but there are no updates).
> > 
> > Maybe you could maintain it as a team and share what you already done?
> > 
> > And just in case you need a sponsor, you can send a message :-)
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > Nelson
> > 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: