On 25/02/2008, Miriam Ruiz wrote: > > Note that ftpmasters are OK with that ATM, but that -legal hasn't > > reached the same conclusion. > > It's the ftpmasters who are responsible for taking that decision and > the ones who have to reach the decision. debian-legal cannot do any > official statement regarding Debian, it's just a consultive mailing > list. > > "The only official statements about DFSG compliance are made by the > ftpmasters." ( Marco d''Itri , > http://www.usenetarticles.com/thread/804922.html ) Sure, but still, since there are some points against them WRT DFSG compliance, that's the kind of licenses I consider as acceptable, but not one I would eventually recommend upstreams to switch to. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois
Attachment:
pgpYaNliyTwuK.pgp
Description: PGP signature