[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#465886: O: limo -- Lists files in a custom way



Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

The current maintainer of limo, James Morrison <phython@debian.org>,
is apparently not active anymore.  Therefore, I orphan this package now.

Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this
package if you are *sure* you will have enough time and attention to
work on it.

If you want to be the new maintainer, please see
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/index.html#howto-o for detailed
instructions how to adopt a package properly.

Some information about this package:

Package: limo
Binary: limo
Version: 0.3.2-3.1
Priority: optional
Section: utils
Maintainer: James Morrison <phython@debian.org>
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 3.0.0)
Architecture: any
Standards-Version: 3.5.2
Format: 1.0
Directory: pool/main/l/limo
Files:
 3c0416432ea5a0504fe01d09daf8b9c7 554 limo_0.3.2-3.1.dsc
 3f5e495d94a8e71c7c9ac2d969ed54bf 29651 limo_0.3.2.orig.tar.gz
 546be1d4e06a865b42a940a12777d447 5542 limo_0.3.2-3.1.diff.gz

Package: limo
Priority: optional
Section: utils
Installed-Size: 88
Maintainer: James Morrison <phython@debian.org>
Architecture: amd64
Version: 0.3.2-3.1
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.5-1)
Filename: pool/main/l/limo/limo_0.3.2-3.1_amd64.deb
Size: 21046
MD5sum: 0fda3a9a5f55313581ae8a1f35c8443e
SHA1: 6f6d08fc03d3b62328c90813086ca871b0728bf0
SHA256: 407870d758f60adbb70239854dc56c7923b5706a95140a706301571c0ad6c473
Description: Lists files in a custom way
 limo is a replacement for ls with some knobs on. By default, it is
 installed as both limo and as li. It tries to give far more control
 over the output format than ls and has simpler and more straightforward
 (albeit more verbose) options. It also has the -l and -s options which
 behave similarly to those of ls.
Tag: interface::commandline, role::program, scope::utility, works-with::file


Christoph
-- 
cb@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: