Hi Raphael, On Tuesday 12 February 2008 02:01, you wrote: > > I saw your mail to this bug, but I consider QA work team work :-) > Sure it is :) Cheers :) (I didn't really think (at all) you were objecting to this, I just had to make that point :) > But if you re-read the bug report you will see that the necessary > changes to fix it aren't many (but I should probably reconsider that > because of /proc not existing in newer kernels, starting with .24?) Yet, noone has done it for four years. Also I dont think it would be that easy... and anyway: IPX is mostly dead and those still using it have probably old boxes running it already... > I've already requested its removal from stable :) Then I really dont understand why you wait with removing it from sid. Anybody interested to pick it up can get it from various archives... > I don't see any real problem on keeping this report a few more days on > wnpp to give people the opportunity to see it is up for adoption. They had this chance for 4 years. > IMO some people prefer to fix an existing package than to 'Debianise' > from scratch, hence my desire to keep it a few more days. > But if you believe it really makes no sense at all to keep the report > open on wnpp feel free to reassign it to ftp.debian.org with a correct > removal request subject and CC me so I update packages-actions.txt I'll leave this to you :-) regards, Holger
Attachment:
pgpzbd6LJdnlD.pgp
Description: PGP signature