[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#448888: marked as done (ITP: ocaml-lastfm -- interface to audioscrobbler and lastfm radios API)



Your message dated Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:13:27 +0000
with message-id <E1It3ot-0004Up-Re@ries.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#448888: fixed in ocaml-lastfm 0.1.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Romain Beauxis <toots@rastageeks.org>

* Package name    : ocaml-lastfm
  Version         : 0.1.0
  Upstream Author : The Savonet Team <savonet-devl@lists.sourceforge.net>
* URL             : http://www.rastageeks.org/lastfm.html
* License         : GPL
  Programming Lang: Ocaml
  Description     : interface to audioscrobbler and lastfm radios API

This ocaml module provides an API to audioscrobbler, the lastfm
submission protocol, as well as the radio API, which allows to listen to
lastfm streams/radios.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-1-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ocaml-lastfm
Source-Version: 0.1.0-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ocaml-lastfm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

liblastfm-ocaml-dev_0.1.0-2_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/o/ocaml-lastfm/liblastfm-ocaml-dev_0.1.0-2_amd64.deb
ocaml-lastfm_0.1.0-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/o/ocaml-lastfm/ocaml-lastfm_0.1.0-2.diff.gz
ocaml-lastfm_0.1.0-2.dsc
  to pool/main/o/ocaml-lastfm/ocaml-lastfm_0.1.0-2.dsc
ocaml-lastfm_0.1.0.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/o/ocaml-lastfm/ocaml-lastfm_0.1.0.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 448888@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Romain Beauxis <toots@rastageeks.org> (supplier of updated ocaml-lastfm package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:45:26 +0100
Source: ocaml-lastfm
Binary: liblastfm-ocaml-dev
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.1.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Romain Beauxis <toots@rastageeks.org>
Changed-By: Romain Beauxis <toots@rastageeks.org>
Description: 
 liblastfm-ocaml-dev - Ocaml interface to audioscrobbler and lastfm radios
Closes: 448888
Changes: 
 ocaml-lastfm (0.1.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Bumped package version for a new upload after ftp-master is back !
     (package was accepted just before it went down..)
     Closes: #448888)
Files: 
 ebe7499dc2a3756f2d10324f6cd593c3 845 devel optional ocaml-lastfm_0.1.0-2.dsc
 c65b3dad2b85fbeeeb30b57f6afec66d 62053 devel optional ocaml-lastfm_0.1.0.orig.tar.gz
 310b295b5b9ea204bdf90af0e83e6971 1930 devel optional ocaml-lastfm_0.1.0-2.diff.gz
 1d3dc4131642a7d8f3e12ae38a79ef9b 32324 libdevel optional liblastfm-ocaml-dev_0.1.0-2_amd64.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHOdaanuQ3Rt5ZmAARAtqWAJ9KwvGjB7byviznx/69rVPgMn7ZNgCgkq13
98lzGjKCTXzHs2sSHyMa8LE=
=zLb9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



--- End Message ---

Reply to: