[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#418072: marked as done (ITP: monkey-bubble -- game in which you must explode all bubbles)

Your message dated Sat, 03 Nov 2007 19:16:10 +0100
with message-id <1194113771.3924.3.camel@pluto.hgc.intranet>
and subject line ITP: monkey-bubble
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bart Martens <bartm@knars.be>

* Package name    : monkey-bubble
  Version         : 0.4.0
  Upstream Author : Laurent Belmonte, Christophe Segui, Sven Herzberg
* URL             : http://home.gna.org/monkeybubble/
* License         : GPL-2
  Programming Lang: C
  Description     : game in which you must explode all bubbles

 Monkey Bubble is a game in which you must explode all bubbles in the
 game area.
 .
 You explode bubbles by putting at least 3 of the same colour in contact.
 Any bubble that is connected to the top or the sides of the game area by
 bubbles you just exploded falls too.
 .
  Homepage: http://home.gna.org/monkeybubble/index.html



I intend to package monkey-bubble for Debian starting from the package
in Ubuntu.
http://packages.ubuntu.com/monkey-bubble

The game requires 'gtk+-2.0 >= 2.10', currently in experimental.
http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gtk+2.0.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
I changed my mind about putting this one in Debian.  We already have
frozen-bubble, and that one is really fun. :)

--- End Message ---
Reply to: