Processed: Re: Bug#429794: jmagick: should this package be orphaned?

To: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net>
Cc: Adam Heath <doogie@brainfood.com>(jmagick #429794), <wnpp@debian.org>(wnpp #429794)
Subject: Processed: Re: Bug#429794: jmagick: should this package be orphaned?
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:51:10 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] handler.s.C.11922869295123.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <20071013144844.GA26105@xanadu.blop.info>
References: <20071013144844.GA26105@xanadu.blop.info>

Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> severity 429794 normal
Bug#429794: jmagick: should this package be orphaned?
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'

> reassign 429794 wnpp
Bug#429794: jmagick: should this package be orphaned?
Bug reassigned from package `jmagick' to `wnpp'.

> retitle 429794 O: jmagick -- A java interface to ImageMagick - java classes
Bug#429794: jmagick: should this package be orphaned?
Changed Bug title to `O: jmagick -- A java interface to ImageMagick - java classes' from `jmagick: should this package be orphaned?'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Reply to:

Prev by Date: Bug#407083: Hi!
Next by Date: Processed: Re: Bug#423316: pnetc: should this package be orphaned?
Previous by thread: Processed: Re: Bug#423298: mercury: should this package be orphaned?
Next by thread: Processed: Re: Bug#423316: pnetc: should this package be orphaned?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread