On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 06:43:39AM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > > My only other comment on the packaging is that very likely the FTP masters > > would reject it because there are two packages with only a couple of files: > > flickcurl, flickrdf and their man pages. In a real package layout I > > expect a flickcurl-utils package that contained both would be > > more acceptible to them, although you can never tell. > > I shall make a new upload. Done! I now have the flickcurl-utils package instead of the two small separate ones. Since I didn't find much information about best practices while packaging an svn version, I thought I'd leave it for the next release, unless you do prove me wrong and point me to a reference about this. :-) dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/flickcurl/flickcurl_0.11-1.dsc I am aware that sime packages (like XMMS earlier) do sync with svn often, but I felt it wasn't warranted... Thanks! Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 458, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature