[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#431310: marked as done (ITA: secpanel -- A graphical user interface for SSH and SCP)



Your message dated Wed, 04 Jul 2007 07:28:24 +0200
with message-id <1183526904.2880.9.camel@localhost>
and subject line O: secpanel -- A graphical user interface for SSH and SCP
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

I intend to adopt the orphaned package secpanel.

The package description is:
 SecPanel is a graphical user interface for managining
 and running secure shell (ssh) and secure network copy
 (scp) connections via OpenSSH. It eases key distribution
 and other tasks related to using these programs.

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 22:42:00 +0100
Source: secpanel
Binary: secpanel
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.41+0.4.2-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bruno Costacurta <bruno@costacurta.org>
Changed-By: Bruno Costacurta <bruno@costacurta.org>
Description:
 secpanel   - A graphical user interface for SSH and SCP
Closes: 317063
Changes:
 secpanel (0.41+0.4.2-4) unstable; urgency=low

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Attachment: pgpmh9kfD0DM2.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Please retitle 317063 instead of opening a new report.



--- End Message ---

Reply to: