[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#426159: marked as done (ITP: libaopalliance-java -- ensure interoperability between Java/J2EE AOP implementations)



Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2007 10:34:08 +0000
with message-id <E1HscYC-0007L8-Sx@ries.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#426159: fixed in libaopalliance-java 20070526-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Torsten Werner <twerner@debian.org>

* Package name    : libaopalliance-java
  Version         : 20070526
  Upstream Author : Andrei Popovici, Bob Lee, Rod Johnson, Renaud Pawlak, Jon Tirsen, Philippe Ombredanne
* URL             : http://aopalliance.sourceforge.net/
* License         : public domain
  Programming Lang: Java
  Description     : ensure interoperability between Java/J2EE AOP implementations
 We believe that Aspect-Oriented Programming (AOP) offers a better solution to
 many problems than do existing technologies such as EJB. The AOP Alliance aims
 to ensure interoperability between Java/J2EE AOP implementations to build a
 larger AOP community.
 .
  Homepage: http://aopalliance.sourceforge.net/



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libaopalliance-java
Source-Version: 20070526-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libaopalliance-java, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libaopalliance-java_20070526-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/liba/libaopalliance-java/libaopalliance-java_20070526-1.diff.gz
libaopalliance-java_20070526-1.dsc
  to pool/main/liba/libaopalliance-java/libaopalliance-java_20070526-1.dsc
libaopalliance-java_20070526-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/liba/libaopalliance-java/libaopalliance-java_20070526-1_all.deb
libaopalliance-java_20070526.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/liba/libaopalliance-java/libaopalliance-java_20070526.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 426159@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Torsten Werner <twerner@debian.org> (supplier of updated libaopalliance-java package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 21:19:48 +0200
Source: libaopalliance-java
Binary: libaopalliance-java
Architecture: source all
Version: 20070526-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Torsten Werner <twerner@debian.org>
Changed-By: Torsten Werner <twerner@debian.org>
Description: 
 libaopalliance-java - ensure interoperability between Java/J2EE AOP implementations
Closes: 426159
Changes: 
 libaopalliance-java (20070526-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Initial release (Closes: #426159)
Files: 
 56cf7db4a19c82f5f95de598dfc432dc 703 libs extra libaopalliance-java_20070526-1.dsc
 897b912f65576b94757594c28ccf9efe 10845 libs extra libaopalliance-java_20070526.orig.tar.gz
 8d17871a3a5bb767ad2fb9be4bbee255 1467 libs extra libaopalliance-java_20070526-1.diff.gz
 a2c68b362abcdc4d96aae1f1a02e6c1c 42994 libs extra libaopalliance-java_20070526-1_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGWY6TfY3dicTPjsMRAngcAJkB4UNFwAina2TMqBjTv6NtFovMgQCgjkI5
RufiMOp0NIrRPUJh7Z2YJbc=
=pGCI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--- End Message ---

Reply to: