Bug#418558: Bug#425952: ITP: emacs-rails

[Luca Brivio <lucab83@infinito.it>]

Alle sabato 26 maggio 2007, JMC Alonzo ha scritto:

> Should rails-el package be named emacs-rails? The upstream project and
> tarball is named as emacs-rails and it would be confusing if the package is
> named as rails-el.

I don't know enough well about policies, just had seen there are many 
minor/major mode packages which are called in that manner.

> In any case, I'm willing to cooperate and perhaps co-maintain if that's ok?
> I build my packages using hg-buildpackage and I already have a version
> controlled upstream and debian source for the current release. If you want I 
> can put it up somewhere and coordinate things there?

Sadly, I'm not going to package emacs-rails, that's the reason why I just 
filed a RFP bug. However I'm slowly learning about packaging and 
maintainership, so feel free to contact me in the future (after all, I like 
RubyOnRails and sometimes do use Emacs(en)!), even beyond testing purposes, 
of course.

Cheers,
--
Luca Brivio