Processed: Re: hsffig: should this package be orphaned?

To: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net>
Cc: John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org>(hsffig #423289), <wnpp@debian.org>(wnpp #423289)
Subject: Processed: Re: hsffig: should this package be orphaned?
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 07:18:30 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] handler.s.C.118007739630877.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <20070525071351.GA32691@xanadu.blop.info>
References: <20070525071351.GA32691@xanadu.blop.info>

Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> severity 423289 normal
Bug#423289: hsffig: should this package be orphaned?
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'

> reassign 423289 wnpp
Bug#423289: hsffig: should this package be orphaned?
Bug reassigned from package `hsffig' to `wnpp'.

> retitle 423289 O: hsffig -- Haskell Binding Auto-Generation Utility
Bug#423289: hsffig: should this package be orphaned?
Changed Bug title to `O: hsffig -- Haskell Binding Auto-Generation Utility' from `hsffig: should this package be orphaned?'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Reply to:

Prev by Date: Processed (with 1 errors): your mail
Next by Date: Bug#425952: ITP: emacs-rails -- Emacs minor-mode for developing RubyOnRails applications
Previous by thread: Processed (with 1 errors): your mail
Next by thread: Processed: Giving up on fv
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread