[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#422424: marked as done (ITP: gnome-mastermind -- GNOME Mastermind is a Mastermind-like game for gnome desktop)

Your message dated Sat, 12 May 2007 17:59:21 +0000
with message-id <E1HmvsH-0007dY-1a@ries.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#422424: fixed in gnome-mastermind 0.2+dfsg.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: gnome-mastermind
Severity: Normal


Hi I've just released the new version of the little gnome game that I've
written and I was wondering if someone was willing to give it some
packaging love.
You can find tarballs, features, screenshot and a better description at
www.autistici.org/gnome-mastermind .
If is this someway useful, Joao Pinto from GetDeb just made a package
for Ubuntu Feisty you can check it at
http://www.getdeb.net/app.php?name=GNOME%20Mastermind
The game is licensed under GNU GPL.

Thanks
Filippo

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: gnome-mastermind
Source-Version: 0.2+dfsg.1-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gnome-mastermind, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

gnome-mastermind_0.2+dfsg.1-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gnome-mastermind/gnome-mastermind_0.2+dfsg.1-1.diff.gz
gnome-mastermind_0.2+dfsg.1-1.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gnome-mastermind/gnome-mastermind_0.2+dfsg.1-1.dsc
gnome-mastermind_0.2+dfsg.1-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gnome-mastermind/gnome-mastermind_0.2+dfsg.1-1_i386.deb
gnome-mastermind_0.2+dfsg.1.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/g/gnome-mastermind/gnome-mastermind_0.2+dfsg.1.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 422424@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bart Martens <bartm@knars.be> (supplier of updated gnome-mastermind package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 08:59:49 +0200
Source: gnome-mastermind
Binary: gnome-mastermind
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.2+dfsg.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bart Martens <bartm@knars.be>
Changed-By: Bart Martens <bartm@knars.be>
Description: 
 gnome-mastermind - Mastermind (TM) clone for GNOME Desktop
Closes: 422424
Changes: 
 gnome-mastermind (0.2+dfsg.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Initial package in Debian.  Closes: #422424.  This package was requested
     by Filippo Argiolas <filippo.argiolas@gmail.com>.
   * debian/README.Debian-source: Documents how the .orig.tar.gz was made.
   * debian/patches/02_dfsg.1.diff: Added.  This patch contains the changes
     that are needed because of the repackaged .orig.tar.gz file.
Files: 
 84edeb3b1f32bc9dc7de9a3866298858 788 games optional gnome-mastermind_0.2+dfsg.1-1.dsc
 b7222d8c925c699b190cd63cb860817d 759792 games optional gnome-mastermind_0.2+dfsg.1.orig.tar.gz
 a56c3b9f8dde8ca3f6cf65f71197bb16 3235 games optional gnome-mastermind_0.2+dfsg.1-1.diff.gz
 6898c4b79cea410dcdf2ce7aa4c11d55 370234 games optional gnome-mastermind_0.2+dfsg.1-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGRd0jbMaawmho9B8RAiFUAJ9IGseBw1iB0psK3fH/mY0QN8oGbwCgpsQP
KeBHH+1c9fba9d5HUavC01Y=
=FmNg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: