Bug#422367: marked as done (ITP: kbuild -- framework for writing simple makefiles for complex tasks)
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 15:59:41 +0000
with message-id <E1HmXWv-0003bZ-A6@ries.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#422367: fixed in kbuild 893-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Torsten Werner <twerner@debian.org>
* Package name : kbuild
Version : 893 (svn revision)
Upstream Author : bird
* URL : http://svn.netlabs.org/kbuild
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : framework for writing simple makefiles for complex tasks
The goals of the kBuild framework:
- Similar behavior cross all supported platforms.
- Flexibility, don't create unnecessary restrictions preventing ad-hoc
solutions.
- Makefile can very simple to write and maintain.
.
There are four concepts being tried out in the current kBuild incaration:
- One configuration file for a subtree automatically included.
- Target configuration templates as the primary mechanism for makefile
simplification.
- Tools and SDKs for helping out the templates with flexibility.
- Non-recursive makefile method by using sub-makefiles.
.
kBuild does not provide any facilities for checking compiler/library/header
configurations, that's not in its scope. If this is important for your
project, check out the autoconf tool in the GNU build system. It is possible
to use kBuild together with autoconf if you like, but you might just as well
use the full GNU package.
.
Homepage: http://svn.netlabs.org/kbuild
BTW kBuild is required for building virtualbox (ITP #406992).
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: kbuild
Source-Version: 893-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
kbuild, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
kbuild_893-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/k/kbuild/kbuild_893-1.diff.gz
kbuild_893-1.dsc
to pool/main/k/kbuild/kbuild_893-1.dsc
kbuild_893-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kbuild/kbuild_893-1_i386.deb
kbuild_893.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/k/kbuild/kbuild_893.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 422367@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Torsten Werner <twerner@debian.org> (supplier of updated kbuild package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 20:35:40 +0200
Source: kbuild
Binary: kbuild
Architecture: source i386
Version: 893-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Torsten Werner <twerner@debian.org>
Changed-By: Torsten Werner <twerner@debian.org>
Description:
kbuild - framework for writing simple makefiles for complex tasks
Closes: 422367
Changes:
kbuild (893-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Initial release (Closes: #422367)
Files:
c7ff4a064833fa6a440bee231edf3541 648 devel extra kbuild_893-1.dsc
d0f1a491e784b766e60ff1918411309e 3089205 devel extra kbuild_893.orig.tar.gz
909e2a11f1f60bfcdf32587cbdd2e612 3032 devel extra kbuild_893-1.diff.gz
423d5a53f96e2433625a69dc358e0200 444062 devel extra kbuild_893-1_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGPZptfY3dicTPjsMRAj7AAJ0RC2OdBqZ8vjU3Kkl1K5T2sfqdBACfYbm7
cKlI3g3uG55AHhKvcJPd5LM=
=co3c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
Reply to: