Bug#182445: ITP: xmlroff -- XSL Formatter
--- "W. Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 07:51:31PM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> > What is the current state of the ITP of xmlroff, Oliver? What is
As far as I was concerned, I had handed it to Wolfgang.
> There was a long time of no visible activity upstream, but there
> seems to be new movement lately. The current state in itself is
> IMHO not really useful. So packaging should only be done in
> anticipation that xmlroff will become a useful FO processor. It
> certainly has the potential. Nevertheless, real life limits my
> availibility for Debian too much for this task, ATM.
Given that you (Wolfgang) don't seem interested in packaging it at the
moment, I'll take another look at it once 0.5 is released. 0.5 is a
significant reorganisation so will affect the Debian packaging so
packaging 0.4 probably doesn't make sense.
What you say about xmlroff's current state is true. At the moment,
packaging it is likely to help xmlroff more than Debian but xmlroff
could do with some help.
Oliver
___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Answers - Got a question? Someone out there knows the answer. Try it
now.
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/
Reply to: