On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 12:21:25AM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
> > A few things: why is it called "tcpwatch" when it only watches HTTP
> > requests? A better name would be "httpwatch".
>
> it's named that way by upstream. I want to keep confusion to a minimum
> and don't see much benefit in renaming it, esp. as it is called that
> way in all the literature. No need to make Debian different only
> because we can, imho. "Iceweasel" and friends cause sufficient
> confusion already (although this is a different case).
Of course, but maybe you can talk to upstream about the name?
--
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
Guus Sliepen <guus@debian.org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature