[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#440822: marked as done (ITP: dicelab -- evaluate the statistical distribution of dice rolls)



Your message dated Sun, 16 Dec 2007 18:09:22 +0000
with message-id <E1J3xvW-0007eu-Rj@ries.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#440822: fixed in dicelab 0.5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Robert Lemmen <robertle@semistable.com>


* Package name    : dicelab
  Version         : 0.4
  Upstream Author : Robert Lemmen <robertle@semistable.com>
* URL             : http://www.semistable.com/dicelab/
* License         : GPL
  Programming Lang: C
  Description     : evaluate the statistical distribution of dice rolls

 With dicelab you can express most dice rolls (and similar things) in a
 functional language, and the either roll the expression, or evaulate the
 statistical distribution. In the latter case you can choose whether you want to simply roll and tally many times, or actually compute the distribution (which
 is more precise, but takes a long time in some obscure cases).

smallish package by me :) 

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-1-amd64
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

-- 
Robert Lemmen                               http://www.semistable.com 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: dicelab
Source-Version: 0.5-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
dicelab, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

dicelab_0.5-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/d/dicelab/dicelab_0.5-1.diff.gz
dicelab_0.5-1.dsc
  to pool/main/d/dicelab/dicelab_0.5-1.dsc
dicelab_0.5-1_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/d/dicelab/dicelab_0.5-1_amd64.deb
dicelab_0.5.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/d/dicelab/dicelab_0.5.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 440822@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Robert Lemmen <robertle@semistable.com> (supplier of updated dicelab package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 17:06:15 +0100
Source: dicelab
Binary: dicelab
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: robertle@semistable.com
Changed-By: Robert Lemmen <robertle@semistable.com>
Description: 
 dicelab    - evaluate the statistical distribution of dice rolls
Closes: 440822
Changes: 
 dicelab (0.5-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Initial release (closes: #440822)
Files: 
 84244074aae0bcdd3471a9ee09594184 563 math extra dicelab_0.5-1.dsc
 7d976b639f5330f19444a2edb7b44468 155220 math extra dicelab_0.5.orig.tar.gz
 cfe5ed4d38829133f4f923b77a1e8b6d 1624 math extra dicelab_0.5-1.diff.gz
 6a1e2cd51cbcca3d3d33cbb2d6d0b08f 37330 math extra dicelab_0.5-1_amd64.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHXWlRS6AOchRbaWYRAt43AJ427rZwGF18uUGQNcalMhq4COvUJACgia2f
p25F/E2h018LHrV0jeDNstM=
=r2uY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



--- End Message ---

Reply to: