[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#274451: O: metamail -- An implementation of MIME Reply-To:

(Seems like you dropped several people from Cc. Re-adding them)

On 10/12/07 at 10:21 +1000, Alexander Zangerl wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 15:49:43 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum writes:
> >Are you aware of the current metamail situation? Do you think it could
> >be safely removed from Debian? There are still 3 packages depending on
> >it: exmh, hylafax-server, and raccess4vbox3.
> i'm one of the exmh maintainers; exmh still requires metamail,
> so no, removing metamail is not a good idea.
Hi Alexander,

Since exmh is likely to become the only (or one of the only two) user of
metamail, would you be interested in adopting metamail?

Is there some chance that exmh will be moving away from metamail in the
near future?
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas@nussbaum.fr             GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: