Bug#455003: O: scalemail -- Scalable virtual mail domain system built on Postfix and LDAP
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
The current maintainer of scalemail, Tommi Virtanen <tv@debian.org>,
is apparently not active anymore. Therefore, I orphan this package now.
Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this
package if you are *sure* you will have enough time and attention to
work on it.
If you want to be the new maintainer, please see
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/index.html#howto-o for detailed
instructions how to adopt a package properly.
Some information about this package:
Package: scalemail
Binary: scalemail
Version: 0.18-0.2
Priority: optional
Section: mail
Maintainer: Tommi Virtanen <tv@debian.org>
Build-Depends: cdbs (>= 0.4.8.1), debhelper (>= 4.1.0), python-dev, python-support
Architecture: all
Standards-Version: 3.7.2
Format: 1.0
Directory: pool/main/s/scalemail
Files:
859732dbb398f67548cdc1f501abc8fd 546 scalemail_0.18-0.2.dsc
387f86feb4c92954fe833925491b613b 35227 scalemail_0.18-0.2.tar.gz
Package: scalemail
Priority: optional
Section: mail
Installed-Size: 352
Maintainer: Tommi Virtanen <tv@debian.org>
Architecture: all
Version: 0.18-0.2
Depends: python (>= 2.3), python-support (>= 0.2), python-twisted-core, python-twisted-mail, python-ldaptor, postfix (>= 0.0.20010329.SNAPSHOT), python-zopeinterface, adduser
Suggests: courier-imap-ssl | courier-ssl, slapd
Filename: pool/main/s/scalemail/scalemail_0.18-0.2_all.deb
Size: 36534
MD5sum: ae712ef86d6f394ca556638a5dedc4d5
SHA1: d056befab4ce5b5b31b6f14b767ed674bdd1a34c
SHA256: 9c9ffefd83ae4b6db4d54c75af7fd643737ed20e232669858ebce36381c573c5
Description: Scalable virtual mail domain system built on Postfix and LDAP
A scalable (but not HA, at least not yet) virtual domain system for
handling mail for many users, based on Postfix, LDAP, Courier-IMAP,
Python and Twisted.
Tag: implemented-in::python, mail::smtp
--
.''`. Mario Iseli <mario@debian.org>
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux developer
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
Reply to: