Bug#446652: marked as done (ITP: xfce4-wmdock-plugin -- Compatibility layer for running WindowMaker dockapps on the XFCE desktop)
Your message dated Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:23:35 +0000
with message-id <E1ImZGx-0006JS-JB@ries.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#446652: fixed in xfce4-wmdock-plugin 0.1.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Enrique Monge <emonge@debian.org.sv>
* Package name : xfce4-wmdock-plugin
Version : 0.1.6
Upstream Author : Andre Ellguth <ellguth@ibh.de>
* URL : http://www.ibh.de/~ellguth/xfce4-wmdock-plugin.html
* License : GPLv2 or later
Programming Lang: C
Description : Compatibility layer for running WindowMaker dockapps on the XFCE desktop
The WMdock plugin is a compatibility layer for running WindowMaker dockapps on the XFCE desktop. It integrates
the dockapps into a panel, closely resembling the look and feel of the WindowMaker dock or clip, respectively.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-2-k7 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=es_SV.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_SV.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: xfce4-wmdock-plugin
Source-Version: 0.1.6-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xfce4-wmdock-plugin, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
xfce4-wmdock-plugin_0.1.6-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/x/xfce4-wmdock-plugin/xfce4-wmdock-plugin_0.1.6-1.diff.gz
xfce4-wmdock-plugin_0.1.6-1.dsc
to pool/main/x/xfce4-wmdock-plugin/xfce4-wmdock-plugin_0.1.6-1.dsc
xfce4-wmdock-plugin_0.1.6-1_amd64.deb
to pool/main/x/xfce4-wmdock-plugin/xfce4-wmdock-plugin_0.1.6-1_amd64.deb
xfce4-wmdock-plugin_0.1.6.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/x/xfce4-wmdock-plugin/xfce4-wmdock-plugin_0.1.6.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 446652@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Enrique Monge <emonge@debian.org.sv> (supplier of updated xfce4-wmdock-plugin package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 09:36:13 -0600
Source: xfce4-wmdock-plugin
Binary: xfce4-wmdock-plugin
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.1.6-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Xfce Maintainers <pkg-xfce-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Enrique Monge <emonge@debian.org.sv>
Description:
xfce4-wmdock-plugin - Compatibility layer for running WindowMaker dockapps on the XFCE
Closes: 446652
Changes:
xfce4-wmdock-plugin (0.1.6-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
[ Enrique Monge ]
* Initial release closes: #446652
Files:
5e10a452d0355ad2ae404ffb441b88ff 902 x11 optional xfce4-wmdock-plugin_0.1.6-1.dsc
1ffc879812cfbf04e2ee91ca51abed0a 364222 x11 optional xfce4-wmdock-plugin_0.1.6.orig.tar.gz
abed75c8bf8d6ab62e0bbc0d3b185f4c 1381 x11 optional xfce4-wmdock-plugin_0.1.6-1.diff.gz
849b98189efff494dfed2405ec4d08fc 25200 x11 optional xfce4-wmdock-plugin_0.1.6-1_amd64.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHGyyXMQdl+99c4rQRAkGFAKCA+YHt6BOZmpCBBSvvQQ7Ow/dl7QCfQqxY
eDx+mxkHVXshNwzuThXAxdo=
=D2rK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
Reply to: