[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#424844: marked as done (ITP: ircservices-church -- Nick/channel/other services for IRC networks)

Your message dated Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:32:51 +0100
with message-id <1192995171.7726.14.camel@regulus.retout.co.uk>
and subject line ircservices-church ITP
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tim Retout <tim@retout.co.uk>


* Package name    : ircservices
  Version         : 5.1pre1
  Upstream Author : Andrew Church <achurch@achurch.org>
* URL             : http://www.ircservices.za.net/
* License         : GPLv2
  Programming Lang: C
  Description     : Nick/channel/other services for IRC networks

 IRC Services is a system of services to be used with Internet Relay Chat
 networks. It provides for definitive nickname and channel ownership, as
 well as the ability to send messages ("memos") to offline users, and
 gives IRC operators considerably more control over the network.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Having given it some thought, and considering that

      * IRC Services as shipped will not build on 64-bit architectures,
      * Andrew Church does not want the patch to fix this, for
        historical reasons,
      * my original intent for this software was for use on amd64
        servers,
      * I am unwilling to maintain large patches against upstream,

regrettably I have lost interest in packaging IRC Services for Debian. I
am therefore closing the ITP.

Sorry for taking so long to come to this conclusion.

-- 
Tim Retout <tim@retout.co.uk>

--- End Message ---
Reply to: