Bug#444334: libmowgli packaging

[Patrick Schoenfeld <schoenfeld@in-medias-res.com>]

Hi,

On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 01:44:42AM +0200, "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" wrote:
> I already have a working package and plan to upload it soon.

why didn't you file an ITP, then? I started preparing a package with my ITP and
sent it to my sponsor already, so that he checks this package and uploads it,
if it is ready.

> Could you please let me care of this package, as the work is already
> done and because I'm used to work with the atheme guys (audacious
> maintainer).

Hmm. I don't want to do that, as the work on my side is already done as well.
Its your fault that double effort has been done, because you did not file an
ITP. But I don't want to search someone to blame. Probably it would help us
both to join our efforts and team-maintain the package? I know that libmowgli
is needed for (upcoming) versions of audacious (in fact that is the reason why
I packaged it) and so I see that you have a reason for maintaining the package.
Its the first library I am packaging so I could eventually benefit from this
coorperation.

What do you think?

Regards,
Patrick