[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#423396: marked as done (ITP: getstream -- DVB streaming application)

Your message dated Sun, 19 Aug 2007 15:07:38 +0000
with message-id <E1IMmNO-0007Yg-SI@ries.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#423396: fixed in getstream 20070419-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

  Package name    : getstream
  Version         : 20070419
  Upstream Author : Florian Lohoff <flo@rfc822.org>
  URL             : http://silicon-verl.de/home/flo/projects/streaming/
  License         : GPL
  Programming Lang: C
  Description     : DVB streaming application

getstream is i small utility which is able to pull an MPEG transport
stream from a DVB card and stream it to the local area network. It is
written to replace VLC, and uses much less CPU and memory than VLC.
Features:

    * Full transponder streaming
    * UDP or RTP multicast streaming
    * SAP/SDP Announcements (VLC Compatible) for multicast streams
    * HTTP streaming for unicast setups
    * High optimization for multiple transponders per machine


-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.21.1-x300 (PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_DK, LC_CTYPE=en_DK (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: getstream
Source-Version: 20070419-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
getstream, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

getstream_20070419-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/getstream/getstream_20070419-1.diff.gz
getstream_20070419-1.dsc
  to pool/main/g/getstream/getstream_20070419-1.dsc
getstream_20070419-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/getstream/getstream_20070419-1_i386.deb
getstream_20070419.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/g/getstream/getstream_20070419.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 423396@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Herve Rousseau <herve@moulticast.net> (supplier of updated getstream package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 17:23:59 +0200
Source: getstream
Binary: getstream
Architecture: source i386
Version: 20070419-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Herve Rousseau <herve@moulticast.net>
Changed-By: Herve Rousseau <herve@moulticast.net>
Description: 
 getstream  - DVB streaming application
Closes: 423396
Changes: 
 getstream (20070419-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Initial release (Closes: #423396)
Files: 
 4ebcf5de6b2665a155c0d806b98e41e2 607 net extra getstream_20070419-1.dsc
 b000863b5ad6bd293f46a70447923c8d 58702 net extra getstream_20070419.orig.tar.gz
 1240b726aba937cd0500d2c60a75e7b8 2184 net extra getstream_20070419-1.diff.gz
 8168c87bfbe6be61576dadf40520a6bc 34426 net extra getstream_20070419-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGuBbEJ9EDSN0bDvcRAppDAJ9wly8840KuOuiW9WkTgjnRIRibZACdE3RP
oMoPLXkf+sPZuFnr6eQ2cgY=
=UUD4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: