[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#433684: ITP: gnome-launch-box -- An application launcher for GNOME



Le vendredi 20 juillet 2007 à 10:15 +0200, Sebastian Dröge a écrit :
> On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 21:30 +0200, Julien Lavergne wrote:
> > Le jeudi 19 juillet 2007 à 12:15 +0200, Sebastian Dröge a écrit :
> > > Am Mittwoch, den 18.07.2007, 22:17 +0200 schrieb Julien Lavergne:
> > > > Package: wnpp
> > > > Severity: wishlist
> > > > Owner: Julien Lavergne <julien.lavergne@gmail.com>
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > * Package name    : gnome-launch-box
> > > >   Version         : 0.2
> > > >   Upstream Author : Sven Herzberg  <sven@imendio.com>
> > > > * URL             : http://developer.imendio.com/projects/gnome-launch-box
> > > > * License         : GPL
> > > >   Programming Lang: C
> > > >   Description     : An application launcher for GNOME
> > > > 
> > > > Launch Box is an application launcher for the GNOME Environnement.
> > > > Currently supported modules are: 
> > > >    * Application starting and launch
> > > >    * Evolution contacts lookup and mail to
> > > >    * Recent files lookup and open
> > > >    * Files in your desktop and open
> > > >    * Firefox bookmarks lookup and opening
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > if you want to make your life a bit easier you can base your package on
> > > the one from Ubuntu, adjust it or clean it up for Debian if necessary.
> > > 
> > > http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/g/gnome-launch-box/
> > > 
> > > Bye
> > > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Thanks for the tips. Yes, that's what I did. I did some "refresh" in
> > control file and add a man page. I upload the package on
> > mentors.debian.org :
> > http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=gnome-launch-box
> > linda and lintian seems ok with it, so I wait for a sponsor to look at
> > it.
> 
> Looks good... but IMHO it would be good to say in copyright where you
> got the base package from, who did the packaging, etc instead of
> relicensing other's work as GPL under your copyright ;)
> 
> Also keeping the old changelog entries is good style IMHO.
> 
Thanks for looking at it. You're right, I will change this as soon as I
have some free time.




Reply to: