Hi Nicolas, it was good to meet you in Edinburgh! On Saturday 09 June 2007 21:57, you wrote: > >> The package is now named ttf-sil-andika-desrev to better reflect the > >> design review status, of course it is still very useful at this stage > >> but we wanted to make that clearer. (When the more complete Andika is > >> released when can do a rename). > > > > Hmmm. This means, they will need to go through NEW twice :-/ Wouldn't it > > be better (and have the same effect) to note that in the versionnumber > > and package description? > OK, so I took your advice: it's better at this stage to keep the initial > ITP name. Makes it easier for you and the ftp-master team. ok, cool :) > The design review status is made clear in the packaging description and > the changelog. Great, was that already in ttf-sil-andika-desrev_0.001-2.dsc ? > Will be putting up the new source package shortly. :) Probably not, as my remarks file is from the 28th of may (arrg! sorry for taking so long...!) Anyway, those were the remarks I had at that time and against 0.001-2: - linda+lintian clean, nice - feedback period is complete (jan 31 2007) but the description or README mentions it still... (minor, I would still sponsor it like this, but you should fix it :) - licence of the packaging? not mentioned in debian/copyright - version: 0.0.desrev-2007.05.08-2 / ttf-sil-andika - you said above this is resolved/changed - control/description mentions authors, debian/copyright doesnt - AndikaDevRev(A-G).ttf - are those different fonts or different revisions? I guess the only issue which really blocks sponsoring is the copyright and naming stuff, the rest would be nice if you could fix/enhance it. Can you point me to a new source package? If the blocking stuff is fixed, I'll upload immediatly this time :-) regards, Holger (still sorry for taking so long to send this short mail...)
Attachment:
pgpNGKHN0ex3E.pgp
Description: PGP signature