Bug#422296: Adopting websec
On 26/06/07 at 14:01 +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
> * Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net> [070626 13:56]:
> > On 26/06/07 at 00:29 +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I believe I've answered your email but I just looked at the bts and I
> > > see no record for it so here goes another reply for the record.
> > >
> > > You asked if I wanted to adopt websec for which I am upstream
> > > maintainer. I will probably do that if no one else does, but I'd be
> > > happier if someone else does the Debian packaging as I have little time
> > > to work on websec and having someone else maintain the Debian packaging
> > > and forwarding just the upstream bugs would be better for me.
> > >
> > > Let me know if you are still interested in maintaining websec, if not
> > > I'll go for the default option and adopt it myself so it won't
> > > package-rot too much.
> >
> > Hi Baruch,
> >
> > My perl knowledge is very limited, so I don't feel confortable
> > maintaining it alone. However, if you want to share the load for the
> > packaging bugs, we could maintain it together on collab-maint.
>
> OK. Works for me. I'm not a perl guru myself but I can handle myself
> with enough manpage reading.
>
> I'd be happy to try git for for package maintenance but have no problem
> working with svn (or possibly another choice). Do you have any
> preference?
Ah, I don't know git either, but trying it sounds good to me.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
Reply to: