[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#283005: ispCP debian package



Hello,

On 18/06/07, Hendrik Frenzel <hfrenzel@scunc.net> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hi,

i'm currently working at the ispcp packages, so there is no need to restart the packaging.

The packages builds lintian clean at the moment and installs the files a bit FHS conform.
Now i'm starting convert the config and {pre,post}{ins,rm} of my VHCS Packages to ispcp.

Well, the plans are to provide the debian/ scripts from upstream; and
of course making any required change to ispCP so there's no need of
applying any patch for the Debian package.
And as you may see in http://www.isp-control.net/ispcp/ticket/394
there are still some thing to do.

If you wish to help the packaging I guess we can work together, so
maybe you can get svn access (I'll talk to the others about all
this.).



I think in about 2-4 Weeks the 1st packages can be tested.

Only the update-path from vhcs to ispcp might be a not so trivial problem, because the database names and many paths
have changed.

I'm not sure about this, but I think DD's won't like upgrade stuff
from a package that never existed in the Debian rep to a new coming
one. You would have to provide that feature on your own packages.
But I think you'll want to wait until our vhcs to ispCP script is ready.


Bye
Hendrik
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGdtwzjWcQfAgCZA8RCPxKAKCUz2sDvZVEe65Omp/M6JWdaTbPRgCcDArV
dOGH4YG2EM7rcw9vMpZ3hbk=
=njqH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Sincerely,

--
Atomo64 - Raphael

Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html



Reply to: