Your message dated Sat, 16 Jun 2007 11:15:37 +0200 with message-id <20070616091537.GI3155@localhost> and subject line package removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: O: babygimp
- From: Kenneth Pronovici <pronovic@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 21:52:31 -0600
- Message-id: <20070227035231.GA2422@cedar-solutions.com>
- Reply-to: Kenneth Pronovici <pronovic@debian.org>
Package: wnpp Severity: normal I am orphaning babygimp. It doesn't work, upstream is dead and unresponsive, no one has stepped forward to fix any of the bugs with it, and I am really not interested in debugging nasty Perl-Tk incompatibilities. :) I have also requested that babygimp be removed from the archive. If someone steps forward the claim the package (unlikely) then we can close the bug against ftp.debian.org. KEN -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-k7 Locale: LANG=en, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US) -- Kenneth J. Pronovici <pronovic@debian.org>Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 412626-close@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: package removed
- From: Thomas Huriaux <thomas.huriaux@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 11:15:37 +0200
- Message-id: <20070616091537.GI3155@localhost>
See #412625. -- Thomas Huriaux
--- End Message ---