[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#322688: marked as done (ITP: lufis -- allows applications using lufs to use fuse instead)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:03:09 +0100
with message-id <1181746989.5069.37.camel@chianamo>
and subject line lufis is no longer useful
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Wise <pabs3@bonedaddy.net>

* Package name    : lufis
  Version         : 0.3
  Upstream Author : Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
* URL             : http://fuse.sourceforge.net
* License         : GPL
  Description     : allows applications using lufs to use fuse instead
This is a modified LUFS daemon, which uses the FUSE kernel module.  It
is binary compatible with existing LUFS filesystems, so no recompilation
is needed.

I'm packaging this in order to allow packaging captive ntfs (I'm
surprised debian doesn't have this) without depending on lufs, which is
unmaintained upstream, but use fuse instead, which is maintained
upstream.

The description is pretty cruddy, if anyone has suggestions, that would
be great.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=Paul+Wise&comaint=yes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Initially I wanted lufis for captiventfs. These days there is native
write support in the linuxntfs project and lufs has been more fully
overtaken by fuse. I'm no longer interested in packaging lufis.

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


--- End Message ---
Reply to: