On Mon Apr 30 21:02, Miriam Ruiz wrote: > > --- Matthew Johnson <matt@matthew.ath.cx> escribió: > > > Wanting to play with the new version I started doing the dfsg packaging. > > I've hence updated the version number in the changelog to be .dfsg and > > updated the get-orig-source rule in debian/rules to remove all the songs > > we can't distribute. Miry, any update on suitable fonts? > data/title.ttf: > copyright by Astigmatic One Eye ( http://www.astigmatic.com/freeware.html ) > > The typefaces on this page have been designed for you to use and enjoy free of > charge. Use them in your Personal and Commercial projects and designs. > > We only ask that you do not redistribute the fonts themselves or create > derivative products, whether other fonts, stickers, stencils, or other > alphabet products (for free or profit) to others without our permission. If > you have a question about our policy, or wish to license for these purposes, > please feel free to contact us at astigma@astigmatic.com. We should ask them if they are happy to licence it appropriately. You never know. > data/default.ttf: > copyright by 1001 Free Fonts: http://www.1001freefonts.com/ > It's hard to know exactly which font it is, who owns the copyright or what the > license is, but I guess it might not be DFSG-free. > > Whatever font we decide to use, it won'T be really very similar to the > original ones, but I cannot think of anything better. > http://www.1001freefonts.com/winfonts/firestarter.zip <-- this is pretty similar, and has a contact address we could try to get licenced appropriately as well. > > On a similar note, does anyone fancy approaching these people to see if > > they would licence their FoF track appropriately: > > http://scenerychannel.com/fof.html ? > > Do we know if we can consider the tutorial as not being a song? if it's not a > song, and the authors license it as DFSG-free, that would be enough for the > moment. We might put FoF in main and tell people to get the songs from > whenever they want, as they do with .AVIs, .MP3s or .SWFs. We could even > consider putting the rest of the songs in non-free, but it's not inmediate > how. The most important thing for me right now is putting the program in main. I believe they have said we can consider it not a song. > BTW, my latest trial of the program showed me an error, as it seems FoF is > trying to use amanith, do you get the same error too? We should ask upstream > if they changed something. Yup, (after my last email) I fixed it by commenting out Svg.py:240. It seems it's not using amanith when the pngs are there, but still trying to initialise it and failing. Commenting the initialisation works because it's never actually called. I also had to install python-pyogg; I'm not 100% sure why, but it seems sensible thing to depend on anyway (even when it does work without, it's heavier on the memory usage, according to the docs). Matt
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature