[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#415036: marked as done (ITP: arp-scan -- arp scanning and fingerprinting tool)

Your message dated Sun, 22 Apr 2007 16:51:56 +0000
with message-id <E1HffI4-00055q-Ao@ries.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#415036: fixed in arp-scan 1.5-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tim Brown <timb@nth-dimension.org.uk>

* Package name    : arp-scan
  Version         : 1.5
  Upstream Author : Roy Hills <roy.hills@nta-monitor.com>
* URL             : http://www.nta-monitor.com/tools/arp-scan/
* License         : GPL
  Programming Lang: C
  Description     : arp scanning and fingerprinting tool

arp-scan is a command-line tool that uses the ARP protocol to discover 
and fingerprint IP hosts on the local network. It is available for Linux 
and BSD under the GPL licence.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: arp-scan
Source-Version: 1.5-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
arp-scan, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

arp-scan_1.5-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/a/arp-scan/arp-scan_1.5-5.diff.gz
arp-scan_1.5-5.dsc
  to pool/main/a/arp-scan/arp-scan_1.5-5.dsc
arp-scan_1.5-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/arp-scan/arp-scan_1.5-5_i386.deb
arp-scan_1.5.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/a/arp-scan/arp-scan_1.5.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 415036@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Tim Brown <timb@nth-dimension.org.uk> (supplier of updated arp-scan package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 16:56:10 +0100
Source: arp-scan
Binary: arp-scan
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.5-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: debian@hug.cx
Changed-By: Tim Brown <timb@nth-dimension.org.uk>
Description: 
 arp-scan   - arp scanning and fingerprinting tool
Closes: 415036
Changes: 
 arp-scan (1.5-5) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Minor packaging flaw with orig tar ball
   * Upload sponsored by Philipp Hug <debian@hug.cx>
 .
 arp-scan (1.5-4) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Moved to main
   * Fixed W: arp-scan: extended-description-line-too-long?
   * Removed ieee-iab.txt, mac-vendor.txt and ieee-oui.txt from docs
     list
 .
 arp-scan (1.5-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Initial release (Closes: #415036)
Files: 
 300b09357c01b486bf31474ae0afb3af 591 admin extra arp-scan_1.5-5.dsc
 85b0e04323ce3a423f60ab905a589856 298917 admin extra arp-scan_1.5.orig.tar.gz
 011b7d3b33aa9e6ec71780f6c7e262df 33692 admin extra arp-scan_1.5-5.diff.gz
 16b9fb43c3fdc0e8b239d0c62f78643c 176018 admin extra arp-scan_1.5-5_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGCXdSaZN+myf86ycRAtCxAJ0UN9v2J07T8qU55UCtPD280M9F3wCfS00J
2xBkwO1G4TstBbFxRy9E3AM=
=JZfd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: