Bug#262922: Retitle small => pawn & license review
retitle 262922 RFP: pawn -- The PAWN scripting language
thanks
SMALL has been renamed as PAWN.
I also checked through PAWN version 3.2.3664 (released on 2006-11-11)
to see how it would fare licensewise. I've sent an email about the
following issues to upstream, too.
* source/amx/amxjitr.asm
* source/amx/amxjits.asm
* source/amx/amxjitsn.asm
These three files have
(C) 1999-2000, Marc Peter; beta version; provided AS IS WITHOUT ANY WARRANTIES
as their only licensing and copyright statement. While it would seem
to be safe to assume that the intent is to have them licensed under
the simple, permissive license that some other of Marc's files are
under, they still ought to have an explicit statement to that effect.
* source/compiler/memfile.c
* source/compiler/memfile.h
The only licensing and copyright statement for these two files is
Copyright (c) faluco / http://www.amxmodx.org/, 2006
No license is presented for them.
* source/compiler/scexpand.c
* source/compiler/scpack.c
These files are from September 1997 issue of C/C++ Users Journal.
They are Copyright 1996 Philip Gage. No license as far as I could
see.
* source/linux/getch.c
* source/linux/getch.h
* source/linux/sclinux.h
No copyright or license statement. The files could IMHO use one,
since they're not quite nontrivial.
* include/
There are several files in here that have only this statement, besides
a copyright statement:
This file is provided as is (no warranties).
This doesn't quite provide a license for anything. Stating the same
license that the rest of files under ITB CompuPhase's copyright would
seem like the safest thing to do to them.
Reply to: