Bug#388363: reasons to keep it?

[Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>]

Holger Levsen wrote:
> from the package descriptions, feta and wajig seem to have the same features. 
> Joe Wreschnig, the orphaning maintainer of feta is also it's upstream, so I 
> wonder what reasons there are to keep feta in the archive?
> 
> Wouldn't removing it and adding a "conflicts: & provides: feta" (or 
> "replaces"? it's too early on a sunday...) to wajig a sensible road to take? 
> Or am I missing something?

It's still very useful, but I don't have the time to maintain it myself.
Unless it becomes unusable for some reason I'd like to see it kept.

Cheers,
        Moritz