Re: acx100 source
Eric Böse-Wolf wrote:
> I would be interested in becoming a debian maintainer
> and as I'm using acx100, I could do the acx100-source
> package.
please always write to the specific bug report
($some_number@bugs.debian.org), otherwise your message is likely to be lost.
> I thought a source package might be easier to maintain
> as a binary package? Is that true?
hm? the modules source package needs to remain a source only package in
order to build the modules for a specific kernel.
unreltated to that, you may want to have prebuild binaries for the
debian kernel flavours, if so, read this[0] and write a wishlist bug
report against linux-modules-contrib-2.6.
Regards,
Daniel
[0]
http://blog.daniel-baumann.ch/2006/12/10#20061210_kernel-modules-packaging
--
Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: daniel.baumann@panthera-systems.net
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
Reply to: