Bug#414844: copyright notices and clarity
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri 2007-03-16 13:40:05 -0400, Ian Jackson wrote:
> What is required for a program to be in Debian is that we (which
> includes the developers, our users, the ftpmasters, etc.) are
> _clear_ on what the licence is, and which files are covered by what
> licences.
Thanks for the feedback, Ian. I think you've come to the same
conclusion that Rafael and I have. I'm glad to have you weighing in
on the same side.
> you should copy the email into the source package so that everyone
> can see it
That's a good idea. It'll be in the next revision.
> But I think there is no need for the files that come unchanged from
> upstream to be edited, and there is no need to ask upstream to
> change their package. Of course I approve of you telling upstream
> about this small way in which their distribution might be improved
> but it's not a showstopper problem that they don't.
Yep. I appreciate your taking the time to look into this and to
comment on it.
Regards,
--dkg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iD8DBQFF+vpIiXTlFKVLY2URAqXcAKDmTjC3LJ8SrXghGY2ImYpkzQK27gCgjQOK
QgXkVQQaF8aWMe9Vu/3ZF4s=
=kutw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: