> >Experience shows that detailed features for evolutive stuff are not > >always well maintained....so I'm wondering whether listing the > >explicitely supported languages is a good idea. > > How about writing it like this then? > > As of September 2006, it supported for English, German, Polish, and > Dutch, and had limited support for French, Spanish, and Italian. Sounds better even though one can imagine that it may look silly in 1 or 2 years when the support for French will obviously be compelte and perfect..:) I really suggest to keep package descriptions as independent on the context as possible in order to avoid contant further changes (they are translatable even though not everything is currently in place to allow for their translation yet).
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature