[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#234551: marked as done (RFP: libbooch-components -- The Ada 95 Booch Components)



Your message dated Sat, 24 Feb 2007 12:00:10 -0700
with message-id <E1HL27u-00059R-Hf@merkel.debian.org>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

* Package name    : libbooch_components
  Version         : 0.0.20031123
  Upstream Author : Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
* URL or Web page : http://www.pogner.demon.co.uk/components/bc/
* License         : GMGPL (GNAT-modified GPL, see below)
  Description     : The Ada 95 Booch Components

The Booch Components are a collection of generic containers (Bags,
Collections, Deques, Lists, Maps, Queues, Rings, Sets, Stacks, Trees)
along with several additional useful abstractions (Smart Pointers,
Graphs, Iterators).

This is the Ada 95, object-oriented version of the Booch Components;
the original Ada 83 Components are described in Grady Booch's classic
text book, `Software Components with Ada - Structures, Tools, and
Subsystems' (1987, ISBN 0-8053-0609-9).

Copyright 1994 Grady Booch
Copyright 1998-2002 Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>

This package is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
modify it under terms of the GNU General Public License as
published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2, or
(at your option) any later version. This package is distributed in
the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without
even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A
PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more
details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public
License distributed with this package; see file COPYING.  If not,
write to the Free Software Foundation, 59 Temple Place - Suite
330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.

As a special exception, if other files instantiate generics from
this unit, or you link this unit with other files to produce an
executable, this unit does not by itself cause the resulting
executable to be covered by the GNU General Public License.  This
exception does not however invalidate any other reasons why the
executable file might be covered by the GNU Public License.

-- 
Ludovic Brenta.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hello,

This is an automatic mail sent to close the RFP you have reported or 
are involved with.

Your RFP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 365 days.
- It hasn't had any activity recently.

As this is an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not 
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the RFP is still of your interest, or there has been 
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).

To re-open it, you simply have to mail control@bugs.debian.org
with a body text like this:

 reopen 234551
 stop

Further comments on the work done in the bug sent to
234551@bugs.debian.org would be truly welcomed.
Anyway, if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <damog@debian.org>.

A similar process is being applied to other kind of wnpp bugs.

Thanks for your cooperation,

 -- David Moreno Garza <damog@debian.org>.
 

--- End Message ---

Reply to: