[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#347708: marked as done (RFP: g95 -- A fortran 95 compiler)



Your message dated Wed, 24 Jan 2007 11:59:59 -0700
with message-id <E1H9nLj-0002Yz-Bz@merkel.debian.org>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist


* Package name    : g95
  Version         : 
  Upstream Author : Andy Vaught <andyv@firstinter.net>
* URL             : http://www.g95.org
* License         : GPL
  Description     : A fortran 95 compiler

G95 is a fortran 95 compiler. Current version of gcc includes 
gfortran, which is also a fortran 95 compiler, and infact
a fork of g95. However g95 implements an almost complete
front and back end for fortran 95 but gfortran is still lagging.
As g77 is unmaintained, the end result will be the abscence
of a useable fortran compiler till such time gfortran comes
around. Hence it would be great if someone could package
g95 . After all how would it harm if debian had two 
fortran 95 compilers. Further details on the status of
G95 may be obtained form the fore mentioned web page.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hello,

This is an automatic mail sent to close the RFP you have reported or 
are involved with.

Your RFP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 365 days.
- It hasn't had any activity recently.

As this is an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not 
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the RFP is still of your interest, or there has been 
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).

To re-open it, you simply have to mail control@bugs.debian.org
with a body text like this:

 reopen 347708
 stop

Further comments on the work done in the bug sent to
347708@bugs.debian.org would be truly welcomed.
Anyway, if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <damog@debian.org>.

A similar process is being applied to other kind of wnpp bugs.

Thanks for your cooperation,

 -- David Moreno Garza <damog@debian.org>.
 

--- End Message ---

Reply to: