[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#189062: Withdrawing my Glk ITPs



retitle 189062 RFP: int-fiction-ifp -- Interactive Fiction Plugin engine, a collection of game intepreters
retitle 338468 RFP: xglk -- an implementation of the Glk user interface for the X Window System
retitle 338471 RFP: glkterm -- an implementation of the Glk user interface library for terminals
retitle 338473 RFP: cheapglk -- the most basic implementation of the Glk user interface
retitle 338475 RFP: nitfol -- a Z-machine adventure game interpreter
retitle 338476 RFP: glulxe -- an adventure game interpreter for the Glulx virtual machine
retitle 338477 RFP: glkloader -- a dynamic loading front end for Glk user interface libraries
retitle 339325 RFP: gtkglk -- an implementation of the Glk user interface for the GIMP toolkit
noowner 189062
noowner 338468
noowner 338471
noowner 338473
noowner 338475
noowner 338476
noowner 338477
noowner 339325
thanks

I'm withdrawing my ITPs for the above packages. All of the packages except
gtkglk are ready and available at mentors.debian.net. If anybody wants
to pick them up, be my guest. If you can't find them, just ask me.

I got no answer to my RFS for the packages on the debian-mentors list,
and now looking back, I'm not surprised. The relationships between the
packages are a bit complex, they use cdbs and I introduced automake
to them to make the library packaging easier. All this makes the
packaging a bit messy.

I don't have the motivation to re-work the packages into something
cleaner.  Furthermore, keeping support for IFP makes them much more
complicated, since that means the interpreters must be packaged with a
separate shared library.  All the necessary patches to the sources are
separated in debian/patches, though, so they should be easy to rip out.

I still think it would be nice to have at least glulxe packaged for
Debian, and that's why I'm retitling these to RFPs. I would close the
int-fiction-ifp RFP if it had been submitted by me. I don't consider
the gains IFP gives worth the complications anymore. 

As for the others, I might be remotivated if there was some demand for
them, so please contact me if you care :)

Cheers,
-- 
Niko Tyni	ntyni@iki.fi



Reply to: