Bug#337666: marked as done (ITP: cl-qbook -- create HTML/LaTeX versions of Common Lisp source code)
Your message dated Wed, 01 Feb 2006 09:34:58 +0100
with message-id <87lkwvtr2l.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
and subject line [cl-debian] UCW status?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Nov 2005 17:28:23 +0000
>From luca@pca.it Sat Nov 05 09:28:23 2005
Return-path: <luca@pca.it>
Received: from (dione.pcaserver.net) [195.32.84.213]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EYRq2-0004vj-00; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 09:28:23 -0800
Received: (qmail 27317 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2005 18:28:19 +0100
Received: from sv3-100.epfl.ch (HELO gismo.pca.it) (128.178.192.100)
by sanluigicalcio.it with SMTP; 5 Nov 2005 18:28:19 +0100
Received: by gismo.pca.it (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 37207CC5F; Sat, 5 Nov 2005 18:27:49 +0100 (CET)
From: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: ITP: cl-qbook -- create HTML/LaTeX versions of Common Lisp source code
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)
X-Debbugs-CC: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org, bese-devel@common-lisp.net, cl-debian@common-lisp.net
Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 18:27:46 +0100
Message-ID: <8764r7hunh.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--=-=-=
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : cl-qbook
Version : 1:20051105-1
Upstream Author : Edward Marco Baringer <mb@bese.it>
* URL or Web page : http://common-lisp.net/project/bese/qbook.html
* License : BSD
Description : create HTML/LaTeX versions of Common Lisp source code
qbook is a Common Lisp tool to create HTML/LaTeX versions of
source code.
.
Features:
* Very simple (easy to learn and use).
* It can produce HTML or LaTeX.
=====
Continuation of the series of CL software started with bug #337646.
As soon as this bug will get a number by the BTS, I'll add the package
to the CL-Debian repository [1]. The package is linda and lintian
free and it follows the "Common Lisp in Debian Manual" [2].
Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca
[1] http://cl-debian.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/darcsweb.cgi
[2] http://cl-debian.alioth.debian.org/clid/clid.html/
--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBDbOuVVAp7Xm10JmkRAlMdAJkBC9bJ+q7OmD8rO0gt6YI48RfTHwCggAGq
YHSV8QViVkov3gywczo1cSE=
=He9P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 337666-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Feb 2006 08:35:42 +0000
>From luca@pca.it Wed Feb 01 00:35:42 2006
Return-path: <luca@pca.it>
Received: from [195.32.84.213] (helo=dione.pcaserver.net)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1F4DSo-0002lZ-5U
for 337666-done@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 00:35:42 -0800
Received: (qmail 15625 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2006 09:35:25 +0100
Received: from 209.138.76.83.cust.bluewin.ch (HELO gismo.pca.it) (83.76.138.209)
by littlegospelchoir.com with SMTP; 1 Feb 2006 09:35:25 +0100
Received: by gismo.pca.it (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 65AB0C145; Wed, 1 Feb 2006 09:35:09 +0100 (CET)
From: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>
To: Peter Van Eynde <cl-debian@pvaneynd.mailworks.org>
Cc: cl-debian@common-lisp.net, 337646-done@bugs.debian.org, 337657-done@bugs.debian.org, 337666-done@bugs.debian.org, 337662-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: [cl-debian] UCW status?
References: <1137110375.4651.13.camel@localhost.localdomain>
<871wz072qv.fsf@gismo.pca.it> <871wz0i6ws.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
<200601222104.18914.cl-debian@pvaneynd.mailworks.org>
Reply-To: ML CL-Debian <cl-debian@common-lisp.net>
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 09:34:58 +0100
In-Reply-To: <200601222104.18914.cl-debian@pvaneynd.mailworks.org> (Peter Van
Eynde's message of "Sun, 22 Jan 2006 21:04:18 +0100")
Message-ID: <87lkwvtr2l.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--=-=-=
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello!
On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 21:04:18 +0100, Peter Van Eynde wrote:
> On Sunday 22 January 2006 17:06, Luca Capello wrote:
>> > Peter, could you check if arnesi, qbook and yaclml are ready for
>> > inclusion in Debian, please?
>>=20
>> You should check fiveam, too :-D
>
[...]
> As they build and installed without problems and even linda and=20
> lintian had no comments, I'm uploading them as I type.
And they finally are in unstable! I'm cc:ing the ITPs and closing
them.
Now, for parenscript (ITP #349607 [1]), I'm waiting for the inclusion
or reject of a patch about the documentation. The debian/ folder is
ready :-)
3AThx, bye,
Gismo / Luca
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D349607
--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBD4HK9VAp7Xm10JmkRArSLAJ4tcer/yexChEggVYAtzbcyRavi3wCfboul
4l1nRfNRtDmxqOuE7efZl+w=
=Ilot
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--
Reply to: